Â鶹´«Ã½

Skip to main content

Displaying 41 - 60 of 1549

Simple Health Plans LLC

On Oct. 29, 2018, the Â鶹´«Ã½ Trade Commission filed a complaint in federal court against Simple Health Plans LLC, Steven J. Dorfman, and five other entities, alleging that the defendants misled people to think they were buying comprehensive health insurance that would cover preexisting medical conditions, prescription drugs, primary and specialty care treatment, inpatient and emergency hospital care, surgical procedures, and medical and laboratory testing. On Nov. 1, 2019, the FTC filed an amended complaint adding Candida Girouard as an additional defendant.  

Type of Action
Â鶹´«Ã½
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
172 3148

Benefytt Technologies, et al., FTC v.

The Â鶹´«Ã½ Trade Commission is taking action against healthcare company Benefytt Technologies, two subsidiaries, former CEO Gavin Southwell, and former vice president of sales Amy Brady, for lying to consumers about their sham health insurance plans and using deceptive lead generation websites to lure them in. According to the FTC complaint, Benefytt also illegally charged people exorbitant junk fees for unwanted add-on products without their permission. The proposed court orders require Benefytt to pay $100 million in refunds and prohibit the company from lying about their products or charging illegal junk fees. Southwell and Brady will be permanently banned from selling or marketing any healthcare-related product, and Brady will also be banned from telemarketing.

Type of Action
Â鶹´«Ã½
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
192 3141
Case Status
Pending

The Bountiful Company

In February 2023, the FTC took action against a marketer of vitamins and other supplements called The Bountiful Company for abusing a feature of Amazon.com to deceive consumers into thinking that its newly introduced supplements had more product ratings and reviews, higher average ratings, and “#1 Best Seller†and “Amazon’s Choice†badges. The case against Bountiful marks the FTC’s first law enforcement challenging “review hijacking,†in which a marketer steals or repurposes reviews of another product. The company agreed to pay $600,000 in consumer redress to settle the FTC’s complaint. In March 2024, the Commission announced it was sending more than $527,000 to impacted consumers.

Type of Action
Â鶹´«Ã½
Last Updated
FTC Matter/File Number
2223019
Case Status
Pending