Â鶹´«Ã½

Skip to main content
Date
Rule
7A(c)(3)
Staff
P. Sharpe
Response/Comments
I concur. PS. Called 2-7-92

Question

February 4, 1992


 

Mr. Patrick Sharpe

Compliance Specialists

Pre-Merger and Notification Office

Bureau of Competition

Room 303, Â鶹´«Ã½ Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue

Washington, D.C. 20580


 

Dear Mr. Sharpe:

 

This is to confirm our telephone discussion of February 3, 1992, where you advised that the following scenario would be exempt from pre-merger and notification, under Section 7(c)(3) of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvement Act, which provides an exemption for acquisitions of voting securities of an issuer at least 50 per centum of the voting securities of which are owned by the acquiring person prior to such acquisition:

CORPORATION A owns over 50% of both PARTNERSHIP B* and publicly traded CORPORATION C. ** PARTNERSHIP B forms CORPORATION D as a wholly-owned subsidiary of PARTNERSHIP B and makes a capital contribution to CORPORATION D of certain but not all of the assets of PARTNERSHIP B. All of the shares of CORPORATION D are then exchanged for certain of the shares of CORPORATION C, so that PARTNERSHIP B becomes a shareholder of CORPORATION C, and CORPORATION D becomes a wholly-owned subsidiary of CORPORATION C.

* , ** staff comments: No other UPE.

Thank you for your assistance in this matter.

Very truly yours,


 

(redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.