Â鶹´«Ã½

Skip to main content
Date
Rule
Unknown
Staff
Micheal Verne
File Number
9905008
Response/Comments
None noted

Question

(redacted)

August 18, 1998

Michael Verne
Premerger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition
Â鶹´«Ã½ Trade Commission
6th & Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Room 303
Washington, D.C. 20580

Dear Mr. Verne:

The purpose of this letter is to confirm our telephone conversation of August 7, 1998 in which you reviewed my fax to Tom Hancock dated August 6, 1998, a copy of which is attached, and stated that no filing would be necessary for the transaction set forth in the Transaction Description.

I greatly appreciate your making the extra effort to answer my inquiry in Mr. Hancock's absence and your prompt response.

Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to call me collect a (redacted)

Sincerely,

(redacted)

212(redacted) Attachment

(redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.

Return to top