UNITED STATES OF AMERICA In the Matter of HOWARD S. BERG individually. FILE NO. AGREEMENT CONTAINING CONSENT ORDER The Â鶹´«Ã½ Trade Commission has conducted an investigation of certain acts and practices of Howard S. Berg, individually ("proposed respondent"). Proposed respondent, having been represented by counsel, is willing to enter into an agreement containing a consent order resolving the allegations contained in the attached draft complaint. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY AGREED by and between, Howard S. Berg, individually, and counsel for the Â鶹´«Ã½ Trade Commission that: 1. Proposed respondent Howard S. Berg, individually or in concert with others, actively participated in the creation and dissemination of a program length television commercial which promoted Howard Berg’s Mega Reading. He resides at 1001 Greenbriar Lane, McKinney, TX 75069. 2. Proposed respondent admits all the jurisdictional facts set forth in the draft complaint. 3. Proposed respondent waives:
4. This agreement shall not become part of the public record of the proceeding unless and until it is accepted by the Commission. If this agreement is accepted by the Commission, it, together with the draft complaint, will be placed on the public record for a period of sixty (60) days and information about it publicly released. The Commission thereafter may either withdraw its acceptance of this agreement and so notify proposed respondents, in which event it will take such action as it may consider appropriate, or issue and serve its complaint (in such form as the circumstances may require) and decision in disposition of the proceeding. 5. This agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by proposed respondent that the law has been violated as alleged in the draft complaint, or that the facts as alleged in the draft complaint, other than the jurisdictional facts, are true. 6. This agreement contemplates that, if it is accepted by the Commission, and if such acceptance is not subsequently withdrawn by the Commission pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.34 of the Commission's Rules, the Commission may, without further notice to proposed respondent, (1) issue its complaint corresponding in form and substance with the attached draft complaint and its decision containing the following order in disposition of the proceeding, and (2) make information about it public. When so entered, the order shall have the same force and effect and may be altered, modified, or set aside in the same manner and within the same time provided by statute for other orders. The order shall become final upon service. Delivery of the complaint and the decision and order to proposed respondent by any means specified in Section 4.4 of the Commission's Rules shall constitute service. Proposed respondent waives any right he may have to any other manner of service. The complaint may be used in construing the terms of the order. No agreement, understanding, representation, or interpretation not contained in the order or in the agreement may be used to vary or contradict the terms of the order. 7. Proposed respondent has read the draft complaint and consent order. He understands that he may be liable for civil penalties in the amount provided by law and other appropriate relief for each violation of the order after it becomes final. DEFINITIONS For purposes of this order, the following definitions shall apply:
ORDER I. IT IS ORDERED that respondent, directly or through any corporation, subsidiary, division, or other device, in connection with the labeling, advertising, promotion, offering for sale, sale, or distribution of Howard Berg’s Mega Reading or any substantially similar product in or affecting commerce, shall not represent, in any manner, expressly or by implication, that such product is successful in teaching anyone, including adults, children and disabled individuals, to increase their reading speed above 800 words per minute while substantially comprehending and retaining the material. For purposes of this Part, “substantially similar product” shall mean any product that is substantially similar in components, techniques, composition and properties. II. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent, directly or through any corporation, subsidiary, division, or other device, in connection with the labeling, advertising, promotion, offering for sale, sale, or distribution of any product or program purported to significantly increase one’s reading speed in or affecting commerce, shall not make any representation, in any manner, expressly or by implication, about the benefits, performance, or efficacy of such product, unless, at the time the representation is made, respondent possesses and relies upon competent and reliable evidence, which when appropriate must be competent and reliable scientific evidence, that substantiates the representation. III. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent Howard S. Berg shall, for five (5) years after the last date of dissemination of any representation covered by this order, maintain and upon request make available to the Â鶹´«Ã½ Trade Commission for inspection and copying:
IV. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent Howard S. Berg, for a period of ten (10) years after the date of issuance of this order, shall notify the Commission of the discontinuance of his current business or employment, or of his affiliation with any new business or employment. The notice shall include respondent’s new business address and telephone number and a description of the nature of the business or employment and his duties and responsibilities. All notices required by this Part shall be sent by certified mail to the Associate Director, Division of Â鶹´«Ã½, Bureau of Consumer Protection, Â鶹´«Ã½ Trade Commission, Washington, D.C. 20580. V. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent Howard S. Berg shall, within sixty (60) days after the date of service of this order, and at such other times as the Â鶹´«Ã½ Trade Commission may require, file with the Commission a report, in writing, setting forth in detail the manner and form in which it has complied with this order. VI. This order will terminate twenty (20) years from the date of its issuance, or twenty (20) years from the most recent date that the United States or the Â鶹´«Ã½ Trade Commission files a complaint (with or without an accompanying consent decree) in federal court alleging any violation of the order, whichever comes later; provided, however, that the filing of such a complaint will not affect the duration of:
Provided, further, that if such complaint is dismissed or a federal court rules that the respondent did not violate any provision of the order, and the dismissal or ruling is either not appealed or upheld on appeal, then the order will terminate according to this Part as though the complaint had never been filed, except that the order will not terminate between the date such complaint is filed and the later of the deadline for appealing such dismissal or ruling and the date such dismissal or ruling is upheld on appeal. Signed this day of ________, 1998 HOWARD S. BERG RUSSELL W. DAMTOFT MARY ELIZABETH TORTORICE CHARULATA B. PAGAR APPROVED: C. STEVEN BAKER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA In the Matter of HOWARD S. BERG, individually. DOCKET NO. COMPLAINT The Â鶹´«Ã½ Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Howard S. Berg, individually ("respondent"), has violated the provisions of the Â鶹´«Ã½ Trade Commission Act, and it appearing to the Commission that this proceeding is in the public interest, alleges: 1. Respondent Howard S. Berg has advertised, offered for sale, sold, and distributed products to the public, including Howard Berg’s Mega Reading. Individually or in concert with others, he participated in the acts or practices alleged in this complaint. He resides at 1001 Greenbriar Lane, Mc Kinney, TX 75069. 2.Respondent participated with Tru-Vantage International, L.L.C. and Kevin Trudeau in the production of a program-length television commercial which runs for 30 minutes or less and fits within normal television broadcasting time slots. The television commercial was and is broadcast on network, independent and cable television stations throughout the United States. During the television commercial, respondent acted as the guest and promoted Howard Berg’s Mega Reading. 3. The acts and practices of respondent alleged in this complaint have been in or affecting commerce, as "commerce" is defined in Section 4 of the Â鶹´«Ã½ Trade Commission Act. 4. Respondent has created, and disseminated advertisements for Howard Berg’s Mega Reading, including but not necessarily limited to the attached Exhibit A. This advertisement contain the following statements:
5. Through the means described in Paragraph 4 , respondent has represented, expressly or by implication, that Howard Berg’s Mega Reading is successful in teaching anyone, including adults, children and disabled individuals, to significantly increase their reading speed while substantially comprehending and retaining the material. 6. In truth and in fact Howard Berg’s Mega Reading is not successful in teaching anyone, including adults, children and disabled individuals, to significantly increase their reading speed while substantially comprehending and retaining the material. Therefore, the representation set forth in Paragraph 5 was, and is, false or misleading. 7. Through the means described in Paragraph 4, respondent has represented, expressly or by implication, that he possessed and relied upon a reasonable basis that substantiated the representation set forth in Paragraph 5, at the time the representation was made. 8. In truth and in fact, respondent did not possess and rely upon a reasonable basis that substantiated the representation set forth in Paragraph 5, at the time the representation was made. Therefore, the representation set forth in Paragraph 7 was, and is, false or misleading. 9. The acts and practices of respondent as alleged in this complaint constitute unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce in violation of Section 5(a) of the Â鶹´«Ã½ Trade Commission Act. THEREFORE, the Â鶹´«Ã½ Trade Commission this day of ________, 1998, has issued this complaint against respondents. By the Commission. Donald S. Clark SEAL Analysis of Proposed Consent Order to Aid Public Comment The Â鶹´«Ã½ Trade Commission has accepted an agreement, subject to final approval, to a proposed consent order from respondent Howard S. Berg. The proposed consent order has been placed on the public record for sixty (60) days for reception of comments by interested persons. Comments received during this period will become part of the public record. After sixty (60) days, the Commission will again review the agreement and the comments received and will decide whether it should withdraw from the agreement and take other appropriate action or make final the agreement's proposed order. This matter concerns an efficacy claim made regarding Howard Berg’s Mega Reading promoted by respondent. The Commission's complaint charges that respondent, in concert with Tru-Vantage International, L.L.C. and Kevin Trudeau, made a false and unsubstantiated claim that Howard Berg’s Mega Reading is successful in teaching anyone, including adults, children and disabled individuals, to significantly increase their reading speed while substantially comprehending and retaining the material. The proposed consent order contains provisions designed to remedy the violations charged and to prevent the respondent from engaging in similar acts and practices in the future. The proposed order extends to any product or program purported to significantly increase one’s reading speed. Part I of the proposed consent order prohibits the respondent from representing that Howard Berg’s Mega Reading, or any substantially similar product, is successful in teaching anyone, including adults, children and disabled individuals, to increase their reading speed above 800 words per minute while substantially comprehending and retaining the material. Part II of the proposed order prohibits the respondent from representing the performance, benefits, or efficacy of any product or program purported to significantly increase one’s reading speed, unless the representation is substantiated. The remaining parts of the proposed consent order require the respondent to maintain promotional and substantiation materials related to the claims covered by the order, to notify the Commission of any changes in his employment, and to file one or more compliance reports. The purpose of this analysis is to facilitate public comment on the proposed consent order. It is not intended to constitute an official interpretation of the agreement and proposed order or to modify in any way their terms. |