DEBRA A. VALENTINE General Counsel Â鶹´«Ã½ Trade Commission CONSTANCE VECELLIO KENNETH ABBE, CA Bar No. 172416 Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff v. NATIONAL SUPPLY & DISTRIBUTION CENTER, INC., a corporation, et al., Defendants. CV-99-12828 HLH (AJWx) STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF AS TO DEFENDANT SCOTT EARL Plaintiff, the Â鶹´«Ã½ Trade Commission ("FTC" or "Commission"), filed a complaint on December 7, 1999 for permanent injunction and other relief against defendants National Supply and Distribution Center Inc. ("NSDC"), Data Distribution Services, Inc. ("DDS") and Steven Rayman, pursuant to Sections 13(b) and 19 of the Â鶹´«Ã½ Trade Commission Act ("FTC Act"), 15 U.S.C. §§ 53(b) and 57b, and Section 6(b) of the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act, 15 U.S.C. § 6105(b). On December 28, 1999, plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint naming Larry Ellis, Lee Siegel, and Scott Earl as additional defendants. The First Amended Complaint alleges that defendants have engaged in deceptive acts or practices in violation of Section 5(a) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. §45(a), and the Telemarketing Sales Rule, 16 C.F.R. Part 310, in connection with the sale of office supplies. Now the Commission and Defendant Scott Earl ("Earl") agree to a settlement of this action without trial or adjudication of any issue of law or fact herein. The Commission and Earl consent to entry of this Stipulated Final Judgment and Order for Permanent Injunction and Other Equitable Relief ("Order"). FINDINGS 1. This is an action by the Commission instituted under Sections 13(b) and 19 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 53(b), 57b, and Section 6(b) of the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act, 15 U.S.C. § 6105(b). The First Amended Complaint seeks permanent injunctive relief against defendants in connection with the sale of nondurable office supplies and equitable monetary relief in the form of consumer redress and/or disgorgement. 2. The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this case, and jurisdiction over defendant Earl. Venue in the Central District of California is proper as to Earl. 3. The First Amended Complaint states a claim upon which relief may be granted as to defendant Earl. 4. The Commission has the authority under Sections 13(b) and 19 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 53(b), 57b, and Section 6(b) of the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act, 15 U.S.C. § 6105(b), to seek the relief it has requested against defendant Earl. 5. The activities of defendant Earl described in the First Amended Complaint are in or affecting commerce, as defined in Section 4 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 44. 6. Defendant Earl, by stipulating and consenting to the entry of this Order, does not admit any of the allegations in the First Amended Complaint, except those contained in Findings 1 through 5 above. By executing this Order, the FTC does not admit that any defense to the First Amended Complaint is valid. 7. Entry of this Order is in the public interest. DEFINITIONS 1. "Document" is synonymous in meaning and equal in scope to the usage of the term in Â鶹´«Ã½ Rule of Civil Procedure 34(a), and includes writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, audio and video recordings, computer records, and other data compilations from which information can be obtained and translated, if necessary, through detection devices into reasonably usable form. A draft or non-identical copy is a separate document within the meaning of the term. 2. "Consumer" means any person, including any individual, group, unincorporated association, limited or general partnership, corporation or other business entity. 3. "Telemarketing" means any business activity (which includes, but is not limited to, initiating or receiving telephone calls, managing others who initiate or receive telephone calls, operating an enterprise that initiates or receives telephone calls, owning an enterprise that initiates or receives telephone calls, or otherwise participating as an officer, director, employee or independent contractor in an enterprise that initiates or receives telephone calls), that involves attempts to induce consumers to purchase any item, good, service, partnership interest, trust interest or other beneficial interest, or to enter a contest for a prize, by means of telephone sales presentations, either exclusively or in conjunction with the use of other forms of marketing. Provided that the term "telemarketing" shall not include transactions that are not completed until after a face-to-face contact between the seller or solicitor and the consumers solicited. 4. "Assisting others" means knowingly providing any of the following goods or services to another entity: (1) performing customer service functions, including, but not limited to, receiving or responding to consumer complaints; (2) formulating or providing, or arranging for the formulation or provision of, any telephone sales script or any other marketing material; (3) providing names of, or assisting in the generation of, potential customers; or (4) performing marketing services of any kind. 5. The terms "and" and "or" have both conjunctive and disjunctive meanings. 6. "Employment" includes any affiliation with any business, including the performance of services as an officer, owner, manager, supervisor, employee, consultant, or independent contractor; and "Employer" includes any and all individuals or entities for whom defendant Earl performs services as an employee, consultant, or independent contractor. 7. A requirement that any defendant "notify the Commission" shall mean that the defendant shall send the necessary information via first-class mail, costs prepaid, to the Associate Director for Â鶹´«Ã½, Â鶹´«Ã½ Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, D.C. 20580. Attn: FTC v. NSDC, Inc. et al., No. 99-12828 HLH (ANx) (U.S. Dist. Ct., C.D. Cal.). 8. "Including" as used in this Order means "including, without limitation." I. BAN ON TELEMARKETING IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Earl, whether acting directly or through any corporation, limited liability company, subsidiary, division or other device, is hereby permanently restrained and enjoined from engaging or participating in telemarketing, or assisting others who are engaging or participating in telemarketing. II. PROHIBITED BUSINESS ACTIVITIES A. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in connection with the advertising, marketing, promoting, offering for sale, or sale of any good or service, defendant Earl, and his agents, servants, employees, and all persons or entities directly or indirectly under his control, and all other persons or entities in active concert or participation with him, who receive actual notice of this Order by personal service or otherwise, are hereby permanently restrained and enjoined from:
B. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Earl and his agents, servants, employees, and all persons or entities directly or indirectly under his control, and all other persons or entities in active concert or participation with him who receive actual notice of this Order by personal service or otherwise, are hereby permanently restrained and enjoined from:
A copy of the Telemarketing Sales Rule is appended to this Order as Attachment A and is incorporated herein as if fully rewritten. In the event that the Telemarketing Sales Rule is amended by the Commission in a manner which would create a new or different standard applicable to Defendant's obligations under this Order, Defendant's compliance with the Telemarketing Sales Rule as so amended shall not be deemed a violation of this Order. III. PROHIBITIONS AGAINST DISTRIBUTION OF CUSTOMER LISTS IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Earl, and his agents, servants, employees, and all persons or entities directly or indirectly under his control, and all other persons or entities in active concert or participation with him who receive actual notice of this Order by personal service or otherwise, are permanently restrained and enjoined from selling, renting, leasing, transferring or otherwise disclosing the name, address, telephone number, credit card number, bank account number or other identifying information of any person who paid any money to defendants National Supply & Distribution Center, Inc. or Data Distribution Services, Inc. at any time, in connection with the offering for sale or sale of any good or service; provided, however, that defendant may disclose such identifying information to a law enforcement agency or as required by any law, regulation or court order, and shall disclose such identifying information to the Commission pursuant to this Order. IV. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT OF ORDER AND REAFFIRMATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENT IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within five (5) business days after entry of this Order, defendant Earl shall submit to the Commission a truthful sworn and notarized statement, in the form shown on Appendix 1, that shall acknowledge receipt of this Order as entered and shall reaffirm and attest to the truthfulness, accuracy, and completeness of defendant Earl's January 10, 2000 financial statement and the loan application for the purchase of real property dated October 2, 1999. The Commission is authorized to verify all information provided in the financial statement with all appropriate third parties, including, but not limited to, financial institutions. V. RIGHT TO REOPEN IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commission's agreement to this Order, which does not require defendant Earl to pay restitution, is expressly premised upon the truthfulness, accuracy and completeness of defendant Earl's January 10, 2000 financial statement and the loan application for the purchase of real property dated October 2, 1999. Said financial information contains material information upon which the FTC has relied in negotiating and agreeing to the terms of this Order. If, upon motion by the Commission to the Court, the Court finds that defendant Earl failed to submit to the Commission the sworn statement required by Paragraph IV of this Order, or failed to disclose any material asset with a value exceeding $1,000, or materially misrepresented the value of any asset, or made any other material misrepresentation in or omission from his financial information described above, the Commission may request that this Order be reopened for the purpose of requiring a judgment for consumer redress in the amount of $2,000,000 against defendant Earl in favor of the Commission, less any amount previously received from any defendant in this action for sales from the Long Beach location, or less any amount recovered through his cooperation; provided, however, that in all other respects this Order shall remain in full force and effect unless otherwise ordered by this Court. For purposes of this Paragraph, and any subsequent proceedings to enforce payment, including but not limited to a non-dischargeability complaint filed in a bankruptcy proceeding, defendant Earl stipulates to all of the allegations in the Commission's First Amended Complaint. VI. RECORD-KEEPING IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for a period of three (3) years from the date of entry of this Order, Defendant Earl, in connection with any and every business entity of which he is a majority owner, or which he otherwise controls, is hereby restrained and enjoined from failing to create, and to retain, in a location under his control, for a period of three (3) years following the date of such creation, unless otherwise specified:
VII. MONITORING OF DEFENDANT EARL IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in order that compliance with the provisions of this Order may be monitored, for a period of three (3) years commencing with the date of entry of this Order, defendant Earl shall notify the Commission of the following:
VIII. ACCESS TO BUSINESS PREMISES IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for a period of three (3) years from the date of entry of this Order, for the purpose of further determining compliance with this Order, defendant Earl shall permit representatives of the Commission, within three (3) business days of receipt of written notice from the Commission:
IX. FTC'S AUTHORITY TO MONITOR COMPLIANCE IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commission is authorized to monitor defendant's compliance with this Order by all lawful means, including the following:
X. WAIVER OF CLAIMS Defendant Earl waives all claims under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, as amended by Pub. L. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847, 863-64 (1996), and all rights to seek appellate review or otherwise challenge or contest the validity of this Order, or the temporary or preliminary orders entered in this proceeding, and further waives and releases any claim he may have against the FTC, the Receiver, or their employees, agents, or representatives. XI. APPEARANCE FOR TESTIMONY IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Earl shall appear for his deposition and trial or other hearing testimony in this action, upon written notice to his counsel of record, without the service of a subpoena or payment of any witness fee, and shall provide complete and truthful testimony. Defendant Earl agrees to provide, upon request of the Commission, complete and truthful testimony by affidavit. XII. COSTS AND ATTORNEYS FEES IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each party to this Order bear its own costs and attorneys fees incurred in connection with this action. XIII. RETENTION OF JURISDICTION IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for purposes of construction, modification and enforcement of this Order. XIV. ENTRY OF THIS ORDER IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Â鶹´«Ã½ Rule of Procedure 54(b), there is no just reason for delay and the Clerk of Court immediately shall enter this Order as a final judgment as to defendant Earl upon Court approval. SO STIPULATED:
APPENDIX 1 DEBRA A. VALENTINE CONSTANCE VECELLIO KENNETH ABBE, CA Bar No. 172416 Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff v. NATIONAL SUPPLY & DISTRIBUTION CENTER, INC., a corporation, et al., Defendants. CV-99-12828 HLH (AJWx) DEFENDANT SCOTT EARL'S AFFIDAVIT RE: (1)ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE OF STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER; AND (2)REAFFIRMATION OF JANUARY 10, 2000 FINANCIAL STATEMENT Scott Earl, being duly sworn, hereby states and affirms:
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on March , 2000, at _______________________, California.
Scott Earl State of ___________________, City of ______________________ Subscribed and sworn to before me this __ day of _____, 2000. Notary Public |