Â鶹´«Ã½

Skip to main content
Date
Rule
801.11(e)
Staff
Dana Abrahamsen
Response/Comments
See 801.11(e) amendment in FR of 3/6/87. WE Kaplan 3/27/87

Question

(redacted)

May 6, 1985

BY HAND

Dana Abrahamsen, Esq.
Premerger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition
Â鶹´«Ã½ Trade Commission
Room 301
Washington, D.C. 20580

Dear Mr. Abrahamsen:

In recent conversations with (redacted) and myself, you have described the FTCs current position on the treatment of acquisitions made by newly formed entities. On the basis of those conversations, we understand that acquisitions (of either voting securities or assets) by newly formed entities are not covered by the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 so long as the conditions set forth below are satisfied:

a.The entity must be its own ultimate parent entity.

b.The entity must neither have a balance sheet nor be required by law or by GAAP to prepare a balance sheet.

c.The entity (including all other entities it controls) must not have net sales of $10 million or more.

d.The entity (including all other entities it controls) must not have assets of $10 million or more (i) net the assets to be used as consideration in the acquisition of the acquired persons voting securities (or assets) and (ii) net the value of any preciously acquired voting securities of any entity within the acquired person* (whether or not the voting securities of that entity are the subject of the current acquisition).

Staff Comment: * ?

You have explained that the rationale for this position is that a newly formed entity satisfying these conditions do not meet the size of persons test.

I believe this letter accurately summarizes the substance of our telephone conversations with you. If it does not, please contact me as soon as possible.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

(redacted)

(redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.