Â鶹´«Ã½

After Chief Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell held in his Initial Decision that two of three respondents named in a Â鶹´«Ã½ Trade Commission complaint violated U.S. antitrust laws, those companies have declined to appeal the decision to the federal district court.

Judge Chappell held that Benco Dental Supply Company and Patterson Companies, Inc. conspired to refuse to provide discounts to, or otherwise serve, buying groups representing dental practitioners. The judge dismissed the charges against the third respondent, Henry Schein, Inc. 

In accordance with Commission Rules 3.51(a), 16 C.F.R. § 3.51(a), and 3.53, 16 C.F.R. § 3.53, because neither party has filed a notice of appeal, and the Commission has neither placed the case on its own docket for review nor stayed the effective date of the decision, Judge Chappell’s Initial Decision has become the final decision of the Commission. Judge Chappell’s Initial Decision was issued on Oct. 7, and the public redacted version was issued on Oct. 15.

The Â鶹´«Ã½ Trade Commission works to promote competition, and protect and educate consumers. You can learn more about how competition benefits consumers or file an antitrust complaint. Like the FTC on , follow us on , read our blogs, and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.