The legal library gives you easy access to the FTC’s case information and other official legal, policy, and guidance documents.
Displaying 42881 - 42900 of 44946
Date
Re: The Commission overruling the 1979 staff opinion letter regarding gasohol, Decisions Volume 116
Rayle v. First Natl Bank of Cut Bank et al.
Date
Â鶹´«Ã½ Court
Central District of California
FTC amicus curiae brief in Rayle v. First Natl Bank of Cut Bank et al. before the Central District of California concerning whether an equity receiver may sue on behalf of defrauded customers
File
Rayle v. First Natl Bank of Cut Bank et al.
(11.08 MB)
9301004 Informal Interpretation
Date
Rule
801.1(c); 801.63
The Trust remains in existence and continues to hold title to the asset after the transaction. This is a purchase of a stream of income and not reportable.
File
Original Image File
(90.25 KB)
9301008 Informal Interpretation
Date
Rule
802.51
In order to be an exempt transaction under section 802.51, you need only to satisfy one of the subsections (a, b, c or d) listed therein.
File
Original Image File
(45.28 KB)
9212005 Informal Interpretation
Date
Rule
7A(c)(1); 802.1
See # 23 in Premerger Practice Manual refers to the PMN Office position on loans. Called [redacted] 12-18-92. Noted that the sale of substantially all of a portfolio of loans can be exempt under c-1...
File
Original Image File
(69.59 KB)
9212004 Informal Interpretation
Date
Rule
801.40; 801.1(f)(1)
12/16/92 – Advised [redacted- colleague] in the absence of [redacted- author of the letter] that the premerger office was of the view that the trust units were not voting securities. Asked for further...
File
Original Image File
(136.89 KB)
9212002 Informal Interpretation
Date
Rule
801.2(d); 802.30
12/14/92 The transaction is exempt. The parties have already filed for a merger and consolidation so that the contemplated restructuring is covered by the prior filing. JS andRS concurs 802.30 does...
File
Original Image File
(226.77 KB)
9112003 Informal Interpretation
Date
Rule
801.1(c); 802.63
Called (redacted) firm and informed a cast of thousands in a conference call that my answer was over-simplified. After explaining John Sipples letter of 11-21-90, the parties decided to file and did...
File
Original Image File
(132.13 KB)
9212001 Informal Interpretation
Date
Rule
801.10
If this is straight up, as is, with no side deals (contractual agreements, etc.) then this is ok. Otherwise, we are troubled lets talk. Called [redacted] 12-3-92. [Redacted] said that the parties will...
File
Original Image File
(136.56 KB)
9212003 Informal Interpretation
Date
Rule
801.10(b)
Clarified that payment is not received until after the services is provided. If payment was received before the service is provided the countervailing liability/obligation would have to be added to...
File
Original Image File
(67.67 KB)
9212008 Informal Interpretation
Date
Rule
801.40; 801.1(f)
See File # 9212004
File
Original Image File
(67.97 KB)
9212009 Informal Interpretation
Date
Rule
801.1(c)
Where there is a management agreement for operation by the previous non-holder (esp. where there is a change in name also) this would constitute an acquisition. Facts in this case do not meet this...
File
Original Image File
(99.57 KB)
9211009 Informal Interpretation
Date
Rule
7A(c)(1); 802.1(b)
11/30/92 Called [redacted]. Transaction is not exempt. This is not a lease financing arrangement under 7A(c)(1) or 802.1(b). PS and RS concur.
File
Original Image File
(105.89 KB)
9211008 Informal Interpretation
Date
Rule
801.1(c)
11/30/92 - Advised [redacted] that under the particular facts of this situation, there is no need for lessee to file for taking of title to [redacted] from lessor. Under the present lease, we are of...
File
Original Image File
(323.19 KB)
Displaying 42881 - 42900 of 44946