Displaying 1161 - 1180 of 1549
FTC Issues Study on Competition in Contact Lens Market
Announced Action for February 11, 2005
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Pfizer, Inc.
Announced Action for February 4, 2005
Genzyme Corporation and Ilex Oncology, Inc., In the Matter of
A consent order allowed Genzyme’s acquisition of ILEX Oncology, Inc., but requires the companies to divest certain assets in the market for solid organ transplant acute therapy drugs. Specifically, Genzyme is required to divest all contractual rights related to ILEX’s Campath®, an immunosuppressant antibody used in solid organ transplants to Schering AG.
The Strength of Competition in the Sale of Rx Contact Lenses: An FTC Study
Announced Actions for January 14, 2005
Cephalon, Inc., and CIMA Labs, Inc.
The consent order settled charges that Cephalon's proposed acquisition of Cima Labs, Inc. would allow Cephalon to continue its monopoly in the United States market for drugs that eliminate or reduce the spikes of severe pain that chronic cancer patients experience. The consent order required Cephalon to grant Barr Laboratories, Inc. a fully paid, irrevocable license to make and sell a generic version of Cephalon's breakthrough cancer pain drug, Actiq, in the United States.
Protecting Competition, FTC Clears Genzyme Corp.'s $1 Billion Acquisition of Ilex Oncology, Inc.
Administrative Law Judge Upholds FTC Complaint Against North Texas Specialty Physicians
Sanofi-Synthelabo and Aventis, In the Matter of
The consent order settled antitrust concerns that Sanofi's proposed $64 billion acquisition of Aventis would create significant overlaps in several markets for pharmaceutical products while creating the world's third largest pharmaceutical company. Under terms of the consent order, Sanofi must: 1) divest its Arixtra factor Xa inhibitor to GlaxoSmithKline, plc; 2) divest its key clinical studies for the Campto® cytotoxic colorectal cancer treatment to Pfizer, Inc. and 3) divest Aventis' contractual rights to the Estorra insomnia drug either to Sepracor, Inc. or to another Commission-approved buyer.
Announced Actions for October 5, 2004
Piedmont Health Alliance, Inc., et al., In the Matter of
With an administrative complaint issued on December 22, 2003 the Commission charged Piedmont Health Alliance, Inc. with collectively setting prices it demanded for physician services with third party payers. According to the complaint, the physician-hospital organization entered into signed agreements on behalf of its member physicians to participate in all contracts negotiated and to accept the negotiated physician fees. The complaint further alleges that these practices eliminated price competition among physicians in the North Carolina counties of Alexander, Burke, Caldwell and Catawba. The complaint also names ten individual physicians who participated in the alleged price fixing services. On August 10, 2004, the organization and physicians agreed to settle charges. Also refer to settlement entered with Tenet Healthcare Corporation (Frye Regional Medical Center, Inc.).
New Mexico PHO, Physician Group, and Their Agent Settle FTC Price-Fixing Charges
Announced Actions for September 24, 2004
FTC Staff: California Bill May Raise Prices for Pharmaceuticals
Generic Drug Marketers Settle FTC Charges
Displaying 1161 - 1180 of 1549