Displaying 121 - 140 of 160
Statement of the Â鶹´«Ã½ Trade Commission Regarding Google’s Search Practices - In the Matter of Google Inc.
Google Agrees to Change Its Business Practices to Resolve FTC Competition Concerns In the Markets for Devices Like Smart Phones, Games and Tablets, and in Online Search
Church & Dwight Co., Inc.
Star Pipe Products, Ltd.
Church & Dwight Co., Inc.
U-Haul International, Inc., and AMERCO, In the Matter of
U-Haul International, Inc. and its parent company settled FTC charges that they violated Section 5 of the FTC Act by inviting U-Haul’s closest competitor, Avis Budget Group, Inc., to collude on prices for truck rentals. U-Haul and Budget control more than 70 percent of the “do-it-yourself†one-way truck rental business in the United States. The FTC’s complaint alleges that on several occasions between 2006 and 2008, U-Haul tried to increase rates for one-way truck rentals by privately and publicly communicating with Budget, the second-largest truck rental company in the United States. The proposed settlement order against U-Haul and its parent company AMERCO bars them from inviting a competitor to divide markets, allocate customers, or fix prices, as well as participating in, maintaining, organizing, implementing, enforcing, offering, or soliciting any other company to engage in such conduct.
Valassis Communications, Inc., In the Matter of
Valassis, a leading producer of free-standing newspaper inserts in the United States, has settled charges that it violated Section 5 of the FTC Act by attempting to collude with News America Marketing, its only rival, to eliminate competition between the two companies. During a conference call with industry analysts, a Valassis executive invited NewsAmerica to join in a scheme to allocate customers and fix prices in order to end an ongoing price war between the two companies. Under the consent order settling the FTC’s complaint, Valassis is barred from engaging in or inviting collusive agreements with other publishers or attempting to collude with its competitors.
Dual Consent Orders Resolve Competitive Concerns About Chevrons $18 Billion Purchase of Unocal, FTCs 2003 Complaint Against Unocal
FTC Reinstates Complaint of Unfair Methods of Competition Against Unocal
Administrative Law Judge Dismisses FTC Complaint Against Rambus
Administrative Law Judge Dismisses Complaint Against Unocal for Alleged Anticompetive Practices Related to Carb Gasoline
FTC Charges Unocal with Anticompetitive Conduct Related to Reformulated Gasoline
Displaying 121 - 140 of 160